坦克世界11月26日你问我答受攻击提示MOD或被封

　　- Q: “Why does IS-4 have its historical gun, the D-25T, which is a joke on tier 10, while other tanks do not have such an alternative gun?”

　　A: “There are already enough tanks in the game with “joke” guns”

　　问：“为啥IS-4可以选择符合历史的D-25T作为主炮而其他十级坦克没有这么逗比的备选主炮?”

　　答：“这是因为这个游戏里已经有太多坦克在使用“逗比”主炮了。”

　　- Q: “The missions for Object 260 are too tough and there will be a lot of rigging”

　　A (SerB): “I am already dreaming of how much butthurt will there be as a result of bans for rigging :)”

　　问：“神大人神大人，解锁260的任务太难了，会有很多人作弊啊?”

　　神大人：“我已预见过在我们严厉禁止作弊之后会有多少抱怨了!”

　　- Q: “Will you add bonux XP to tanks with more than 1000 battles?”

　　A (SerB): “…and how about for simply downloading a client, we unlock all the tanks, give you all the premium ones along with a jar of jam and a bag of cookies?”

　　问：“神大人神大人，您会给那些参加战斗总数达到1000场以上的坦克提供额外经验加成吗?”

　　神大人：“。。。。。。要不然像这样吧，以后我们把游戏改成这样，你下载一个客户端，我们就为你解锁全部坦克，再送你所有金币坦克，最后还附赠一罐果酱和一包小饼干?”

　　- the fact that tanks traverse by “jerks” (unlike the fluid turret traverse) is historical

　　实际上在早期版本中科技树是竖版而不是横版。

　　- Q: “Can we expect render range to be turned to circle in 9.5 or 9.6?”

　　A (SerB): “Well, you can always expect anything”

　　问：“神大人神大人，我们可以期望坦克的渲染范围在9.5或者9.6版本中改成圆形吗?”

　　神大人：“你们可以期望任何事情啊。”

　　- it’s theoretically possible to change render range for each tank individually, but it’s not needed – the balance parameter is the view range, limited render range is a technical parameter that would be best removed altogether

　　在理论上为每辆坦克单独改变渲染范围是可行的，但实际上并没有这个必要。因为这个游戏以视野为平衡标准，所以作为一个技术标准，有限的渲染范围最好是被全部移除比较方便。

　　- Storm states that a mod, which will identify not the shooter but only shell type will stay legal (possible), only mods that also tell you WHO shot you will be dealt with

　　Storm表示一个仅说明你被何种弹药击中而不标明攻击者的MOD是可以继续使用的，但使用一个在说明你被何种弹药击中的同时标明攻击者的MOD则会被处理。

　　- it’s not possible for WG developers to simply get rid of the noobmeter part of XVM (hence the idea of anonymizing players in battles)

　　因为“战斗中某些令人厌烦的玩家”，WG的开发者们是无法摆脱XVM插件所显示的“菜鸡组”地位的。

　　- developers are apparently not thinking about reducing the 25 percent RNG in penetration

　　开发者们显然没想过降低25%的穿深浮动。

　　- regarding the current announcement of Object 907 buff

　　– Q: “Fuck this, they should have buffed it only after the third campaign for massive butthurt.”

　　A: “Yea, we thought about it :)”

　　- Object 907 was buffed because it was simply too weak, now it’s okay

　　关于907工程的BUFF。

　　问：“干，你们怎么没在第三赛季结束后玩家抱怨得铺天盖地的时候就BUFF这车啊?”

　　答：“想过!”